Asus N750JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus N750JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N750JK
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateAug 10 '16 at 14:26
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 438
49% 384 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 129D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 6.72
3% 8.87 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 7.96
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 180GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 452
Write 125
Mixed 174
54% 250 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 9.28
63% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 9.47
16% 29.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 82%
Sandisk U100 24GB
0GB free
Firmware: 10.56.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.7% Poor
Read 244
Write 73.4
Mixed 82.8
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 9.94
4K Mixed 3.78
33% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36.2
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 4.78
8% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 34%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
63GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 79.2
Write 66.5
Mixed 66.1
53% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.39
4K Mixed 0.19
51% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N750JK Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N750JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback