Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20151225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '19 at 01:07
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 9,821 User benchmarks, average bench 46% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 129 56% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 210 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	8.41% Terrible	Lighting 10.6 Reflection 9.81 Parallax 15.9 9% 12.1 fps	MRender 7.86 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 10.2 8% 9.61 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.41% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 249GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 165 79 46 36 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 456 Write 232 Mixed 354 SusWrite 85.3 62% 282 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 28.7 98% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 154 128% 184 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 212%
Amd-raid Array 2 999GB 491 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 457GB free Firmware: 6.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 365 419 399 437 266 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 766 Write 525 Mixed 494 SusWrite 369 120% 538 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 28.2 105% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 175 148% 215 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 413%
Generic USB SD Reader 8GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID 0310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.7 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	3.14% Terrible	Read 2 Write 5.8 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 4.5 5% 3.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 31% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.14% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 733 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	46% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 19.9 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 12.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 87.6 46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	42x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	34x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	34x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,795 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $163

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16