Gigabyte GA-MA790GPT-UD3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA790GPT-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '19 at 18:26
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 550
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 87.7
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 94.2
51% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 92.1
8-Core 94.6
12% 93.3 Pts
64-Core 95.6
6% 95.6 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Gigabyte(1458 21C7) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 9.38
9% 10.2 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 7.87
Splatting 12.9
8% 9.58 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320620AS 300GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 57 60 63 65 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 62
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 57.4
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 11
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA790GPT-UD3H Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790GPT-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback