TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM Node 1, System Card

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory144GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 144GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIBM Node 1, System Card  (all builds)
Memory140.6 GB free of 144 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '19 at 14:02
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7-L8867
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 51.3
2-Core 108
50% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 439
38% 327 Pts
64-Core 1,347
83% 1,347 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 59.1%
 Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 5TB
4.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.7% Excellent
Read 263
Write 22.2
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 24.2
63% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
276% 1.8 MB/s
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
9GB free, PID a815
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.8 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Read 15.1
Write 1
Mixed 2
SusWrite 4.6
6% 5.68 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.23%
 Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ82RF8BCFA-AE-F Samsung M393B1K73CH0-CF8 Samsung M393B1K73CH0-CF8 EBJ82RF8BCFA-AE-F Micron 36JSZF1G72PDZ1G1D1 EBJ82RF8BCFA-AE-F Micron 36JSZF1G72PDZ1G1D1 EBJ82RF8BCFA-AE-F EBJ82RF8BCFA-AE-F Samsung M39... 144GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback