Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171221
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '19 at 11:45
Run Duration	282 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 88.6 1-Core 135 2-Core 274 91% 166 Pts	4-Core 507 8-Core 835 82% 671 Pts	64-Core 845 52% 845 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 100%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,316 Write 928 Mixed 386 192% 877 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 30.7 125% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 864 DQ Write 723 DQ Mixed 544 475% 710 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 228GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1248 368 312 311 312 311 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,901 Write 1,472 Mixed 553 SusWrite 477 244% 1,101 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 60.4 229% 87.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,090 DQ Write 1,222 DQ Mixed 772 688% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 236%
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 219GB free Firmware: EMM02D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 467 470 472 441 469 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 483 Mixed 313 SusWrite 460 99% 441 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 55.4 157% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 343 263% 357 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 118%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 44GB free Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 353 354 289 290 289 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 400 Write 312 Mixed 219 SusWrite 319 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 13.2 75% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 87.9 108% 189 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 352GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 152 153 152 149 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 135 Write 139 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 151 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 114%
Seagate M3 1TB 2,563 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 62GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 38 Write 40.5 Mixed 34.8 SusWrite 40.3 28% 38.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.9 192% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 64%
Essentiel B 2TB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 57GB free Firmware: 60A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 81 76 101 78 113 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 30.2 Write 74 Mixed 31 SusWrite 93.6 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.2 104% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 78%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 28GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 51 54 53 54 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 63.8 Write 50.3 Mixed 44 SusWrite 51 69% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2.9 188% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD 4x8GB 407 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.4% Very good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 24.7 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 18.6 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	676x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	303x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	197x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	146x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	146x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	132x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $74Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	50x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	84x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $499

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16