Ciara Discover

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Ciara Discover (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DP55WB
Memory	1.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '19 at 14:55
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 79.6 2-Core 140 65% 104 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 283 37% 279 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 02A8) 512MB Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 1.41 1% 1.85 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 142 130 144 146 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.4% Average	Read 204 Write 131 Mixed 181 SusWrite 136 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 22.5 80% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 148 108% 142 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Slide 4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 4GB free, PID 5508 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.7 6.5 6.8 6.7 6.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	6.18% Terrible	Read 26 Write 6 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 6.5 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.18% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x393955353430322D3032372E4130314C4620 0x80AD 0x484D54313132553654465238432D48392020 0x0198 0x393955353430332D3030322E4130304C4620 0x80AD 0x484D54313132553654465238432D48392020 6GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 12.4 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Discover Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Ciara Discover

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	98x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	15x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	42x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	40x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

SSD
Premier SP550 240GBAdata $74Bench 79%, 29,295 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
CT102464BA160B.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 54%, 2,915 samples	39x
CT102464BA160B.M16 1x8GBCrucialBench 30%, 2,735 samples	12x
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6J1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 77 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $186

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16