Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	82.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '19 at 21:09
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	PAN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$208 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 163 2-Core 280 100% 179 Pts	4-Core 648 8-Core 1021 103% 834 Pts	64-Core 1348 83% 1348 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2197 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.9% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 118 Parallax 99.7 85% 107 fps	MRender 96.7 Gravity 93 Splatting 98 79% 95.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40 8,737 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: V6005-ac Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 792 764 776 805 780 666 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 581 Write 710 Mixed 588 SusWrite 764 150% 661 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 53.5 190% 71.4 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 397 DQ Mixed 292 247% 357 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 153%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 9GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 54 55 55 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 56 Write 56.3 Mixed 38 SusWrite 53.7 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 35%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 35GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 92 91 91 91 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 79 Write 74 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 90.3 55% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 23GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 54 56 56 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 48.2 Write 57.2 Mixed 29 SusWrite 55.2 35% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 72GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 97 95 99 99 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 126 Write 36.7 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 94.6 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 75%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB 3,961 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 167 167 169 167 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 175 Write 176 Mixed 124 SusWrite 167 217% 161 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 71%
SKYMEDI USB Drive 1GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 8628 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 4 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 4.3 8% 7.55 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	86% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 23.6 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 34.3 SC Mixed 27.7 78% 27.5 GB/s	Latency 55.3 72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $349

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,873x
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,612x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	558x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,304x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	650x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	642x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	857x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	568x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	489x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	279x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,293

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16