Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '16 at 18:08
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 66.5 2-Core 110 55% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 230 31% 229 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Sapphire(174B A003) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2311.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Lighting 49.3 Reflection 35.6 Parallax 60.7 40% 48.5 fps	MRender 33.5 Gravity 45.7 Splatting 44.3 34% 41.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2910 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 248 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 52 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 35 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8100976991	72.9% Very good	Read 488 Write 379 Mixed 399 94% 422 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 18.9 96% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 33.8 DQ Write 52.8 DQ Mixed 33.6 28% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 124%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 32GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 16294954 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 -91774861178062 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 678 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 36 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 34 42 90197065762 (C2) HDA temperature 34 42 90197065762 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 16294954 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 16294954 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 16294954 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2711 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1991 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1991 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4811	64.3% Good	Read 475 Write 193 Mixed 227 65% 298 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 18.3 93% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 57.1 63% 108 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 87%
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000H1 128GB 1,750 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3GB free Firmware: EMT22H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 800 (0B) Calibration retry count 99 99 24 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 120 (AA) Unknown 100 100 371 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 4 (AE) Unknown 99 99 24 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1 (BE) vendor-specific 65 46 35 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	45.6% Average	Read 272 Write 155 Mixed 173 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 15.6 78% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 28.8 DQ Write 68 DQ Mixed 16.1 22% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 88%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 107GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 40GB free Firmware: 4.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	28% Poor	Read 49.3 Write 43.7 Mixed 42.9 34% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.28 4K Write 7.68 4K Mixed 6.32 1,147% 7.09 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 55%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 24GB free Firmware: JF3OA0E0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 92 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 181 100 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 754 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 6184 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 751 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 1288490319872 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 49 505413663 (BF) G-sense error rate 92 92 2063 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1769499 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 71902 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	44.2% Average	Read 74.9 Write 79.2 Mixed 76 58% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.19 58% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 59%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$29 34,154 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 12GB free Firmware: HPDA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 233295984 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 285 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4595547 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 3049 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 305 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1774065824 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 42950328332 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 572522530 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 63 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 296 (C2) HDA temperature 34 43 68719476770 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 188 162 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	42% Average	Read 68.8 Write 77.5 Mixed 56.9 51% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.1 47% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB 6,948 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.1% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	139x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16