MSI Z87-G55 (MS-7821)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7821
MotherboardMSI Z87-G55 (MS-7821)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140719
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 18:22
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 233
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 484
64% 481 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 046A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 93.9
58% 74.9 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 75.6
55% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 692 678 724 724 725 721 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 813
Write 738
Mixed 381
SusWrite 710
148% 661 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 38.8
146% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 468
365% 493 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 143%
Great: 237%
OCZ VERTEX2 50GB
40GB free
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 53 59 62 65 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 164
Write 78
Mixed 103
SusWrite 61
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 24.6
100% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 91.5
72% 103 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 51%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
739GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 101 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 109
Mixed 59
SusWrite 100
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 116 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 131
Write 133
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 115
157% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 170 170 171 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 166
Write 165
Mixed 122
SusWrite 170
211% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 105%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.1 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 11
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 2.9
13% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.5% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-G55 (MS-7821) Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z87-G55 (MS-7821) - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback