Acer Aspire TC-603

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-603  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-603
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130621
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 10:11
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 162
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 305
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Sapphire(174B 1645) 2GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
9.8% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 12.9
9% 11.6 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 12
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 354 357 368 386 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 407
Write 404
Mixed 226
SusWrite 367
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 22.1
98% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 81.7
DQ Mixed 80.3
72% 112 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 114%
WDC WD20 EARS-00S8B1 2TB
168GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 86 85 84 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 82
Write 83.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 82.7
92% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 38%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 85 85 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 168
Write 143
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 82.6
152% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-603 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-603

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback