Zoostorm 7200-8012A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 7200-8012A  (all builds)
Motherboard NM70-M
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '19 at 11:50
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1037U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 44
2-Core 56.3
40% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 64.4
8-Core 74
9% 69.2 Pts
64-Core 87.6
5% 87.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 2111) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3621
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 1
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 2.17
2% 1.78 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 86 99 50 124 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 144
Write 111
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 96.7
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R534G1601U2 859B CT25664BA160B.C8FE 6GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-8012A Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm 7200-8012A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback