MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A78
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '19 at 10:14
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 146
2-Core 267
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 798
77% 635 Pts
64-Core 777
48% 777 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7A78) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Lighting 8.37
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 9.25
7% 9.92 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 7.53
Splatting 16.7
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 325 325 321 324 291 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,719
Write 1,367
Mixed 577
SusWrite 369
223% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 56.8
204% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,093
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 825
663% 936 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 198%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
219GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 463 447 443 466 471 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 470
Mixed 408
SusWrite 457
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 57.2
191% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 40 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 37.2
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 39.6
27% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 115 116 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 112
Write 60.5
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 114
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
236% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 67%
OCZ-AGIL ITY3 120GB
32GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 101 100 101 100 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 142
Write 115
Mixed 128
SusWrite 97.9
160% 121 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 23.5
2,636% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 26.5
3,229% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 206%
Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 30.3
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 29.2
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) Builds (Compare 1,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,085
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback