Asus CM1855

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CM1855  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '19 at 02:16
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 78
2-Core 145
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 489
45% 374 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2230 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 141
Parallax 132
93% 129 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 134
Splatting 112
95% 117 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 154
Write 180
Mixed 232
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 7.5
93% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 73.3
85% 145 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
67GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.9
Write 340
Mixed 36.8
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 48.9
161% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 59.2
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 56.8
72% 121 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM SLA302G08-GGNHC F3-1600C9-8GXM SLA302G08-GGNHC 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM1855 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CM1855

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback