Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180414
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
78% 145 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 923
84% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,273
79% 1,273 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1331 MHz, MLim: 2001 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 79.9
48% 68 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 53.1
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NT-256 256GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T170810a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 36
Mixed 124
46% 217 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 27.3
114% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 48.2
66% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
40GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,562
Write 69.7
Mixed 121
1,136% 1,584 MB/s
4K Read 625
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.3
26,433% 210 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.1% Above average
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 17.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback