ECS B360H5-M7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS B360H5-M7  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 11:59
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 226
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 443
57% 433 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D9) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.91
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 21
17% 19.8 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 22
Splatting 19.1
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 80 18 67 62 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 344
Write 99.7
Mixed 146
SusWrite 41.8
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 18.8
76% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 68.5
DQ Write 72.8
DQ Mixed 15.3
27% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 85%
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60
98GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 76 73 71 78 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 496
Write 446
Mixed 353
SusWrite 84.1
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 35.6
134% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 156
147% 234 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback