Asus GRYPHON Z97

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus GRYPHON Z97  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 04:34
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 168
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 262
34% 260 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 67.8
55% 68.6 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 70.7
57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$140
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 173 216 214 197 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 344
Write 246
Mixed 222
SusWrite 203
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 33.2
125% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 162
136% 199 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 89%
Plextor PX-512M6G-2280 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 1.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 347 364 369 370 354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 381
Write 321
Mixed 252
SusWrite 357
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 34.1
128% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 225
200% 303 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 100%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
479GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 138 136 145 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 134
Mixed 85
SusWrite 139
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 83%
PLEXTOR PX-128M5Pro 128GB
119GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 31.5
Write 27.5
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 27.6
39% 29 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 6.3
474% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-025.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GRYPHON Z97 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus GRYPHON Z97 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $939
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback