Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181208
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 03:48
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 682
68% 551 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 56.5
52% 63 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 63.5
53% 64.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 211 206 209 205 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 900
Write 677
Mixed 572
SusWrite 221
132% 592 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 47.3
156% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 393
347% 523 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 124%
Great: 144%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
233GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 437 439 434 426 422 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 450
Mixed 359
SusWrite 433
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 41.2
144% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 258
224% 332 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Marshal MAL34000SA-T72 4TB
490GB free
Firmware: FL1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 91 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 49
SusWrite 90.6
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 30.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.9
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $531
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback