Gigabyte H370M D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H370M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte H370M D3H  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 21:55
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 134
2-Core 270
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 758
78% 631 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 44.6
39% 49 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62.1
49% 59.2 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,868
Write 1,671
Mixed 956
332% 1,498 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 66.9
221% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,334
DQ Write 1,107
DQ Mixed 1,166
888% 1,202 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
257GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 482
Mixed 383
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 55.7
185% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100
244GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 29.3
Write 30
Mixed 28.3
7% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 14.1
52% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 28.7
DQ Mixed 20.9
17% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 105%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
76GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 290
Write 181
Mixed 218
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 37.4
136% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 137
106% 142 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
1TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 90.5
127% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 100%
ADATA SV620 240GB
46GB free, PID a65a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 379
Write 393
Mixed 348
481% 373 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 22.9
1,731% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 28.4
2,324% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 259%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23
Write 5.5
Mixed 9.8
13% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370M D3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $460
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback