Asus P5KPL-AM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 18:45
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 68.2
39% 58 Pts
4-Core 67.3
8-Core 73.6
9% 70.4 Pts
64-Core 77.7
5% 77.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gainward(10B0 11C6) 2GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 21.1
14% 17.9 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 15.1
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 59 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 203
Write 175
Mixed 165
SusWrite 60.4
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 25.8
82% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 38.2
35% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST31000533CS 1TB
37GB free
Firmware: SC15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 60 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 59.2
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 62.3
40% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 67%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
8GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 14 12 15 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.71% Terrible
Read 29.7
Write 7.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 13.4
16% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.71%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback