Dell Latitude E6410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E6410  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 04373Y
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 11:11
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 129
53% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 165
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Dell(1028 040A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.66
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP920 256GB-$203
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 186 84 90 188 182 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.1% Average
Read 210
Write 208
Mixed 192
SusWrite 155
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 17.3
58% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 147
120% 170 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 99%
WD WD1200BJKT-75F4T0 120GB
89GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 54.2
Mixed 51
SusWrite 63
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 37%
MEDION USB 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
8.4% Terrible
Read 26
Write 15
Mixed 18
SusWrite 11.5
22% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.4%
Great: 21%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
512GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 18.7
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 12.8
25% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 52%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
121GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 19.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 13
25% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
134% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125S6TFR8C-G7 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6410 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback