HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9470m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '16 at 11:56
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3437U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 90.3
47% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 132
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3993
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 3.03
3% 4.22 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 7.57
4% 5.04 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SF6S512G1122 512GB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3540000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 467
Write 437
Mixed 254
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 8.59
48% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 37.9
DQ Mixed 7.45
12% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 64GB
27GB free
Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 365
Write 143
Mixed 200
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 7.09
41% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 6.88
12% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback