ECS H67H2-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardECS H67H2-M3  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110214
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 07:56
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 153
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 289
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 6.15
Parallax 5.72
5% 6.04 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 4.52
4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03B05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 66 71 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 72.2
Write 70.7
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 70.9
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 64%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$24
243GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 107 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 108
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 70%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
228GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 34.8
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 37.9
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB9N-CG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67H2-M3 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H67H2-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback