Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '19 at 15:44
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 65.8 1-Core 20.8 2-Core 45.7 32% 44.1 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 382 36% 297 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% EVGA(3842 2784) 3GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 52.8 Parallax 76.6 49% 63 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 66.8 Splatting 51.1 50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 193 187 189 180 184 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.4% Average	Read 222 Write 267 Mixed 223 SusWrite 193 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 18.5 60% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 54.8 DQ Mixed 35 29% 40 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AN1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 23 23 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 59%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 4TB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 2TB free Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 163 146 125 137 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 301 Write 312 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 152 155% 213 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1.2 230% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 206%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB 660 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 136GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.1 8.6 8.2 9 8.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 74%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 100 101 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 112 Write 93.3 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 101 123% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.7 195% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 23,732 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 14.2 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 7.4 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16