Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181011
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '19 at 13:57
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 129
2-Core 260
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 698
70% 569 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1481) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6291
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 0.09
5% 10 fps
MRender 9.62
Gravity 5.87
Splatting 12.6
8% 9.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 201 197 193 199 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
71% Very good
Read 397
Write 352
Mixed 276
SusWrite 207
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 27.9
88% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 269
220% 313 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 121 125 130 132 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 90.3
Write 119
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 127
71% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 24
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback