Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120802
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '19 at 13:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 82
2-Core 151
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 308
39% 296 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
PwrHis(1787 2311) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.18 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.91
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 360
Write 264
Mixed 282
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 22.1
80% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22.7
DQ Write 75.2
DQ Mixed 31
29% 43 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
140GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 141 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 142
Write 141
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 140
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 99U5471-039.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback