Asus K52F

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus K52F (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K52F
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '19 at 22:04
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 540 8,329 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 66 1-Core 66.9 2-Core 138 53% 90.1 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 159 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1BE2) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 91 57 53 52 66 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40% Average	Read 234 Write 220 Mixed 198 SusWrite 81.8 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 19.2 64% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 86.6 DQ Mixed 94.4 80% 118 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 85GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 58 Write 59 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 58.6 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.3% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.2 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.7 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K52F Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K52F

CPU
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	55x
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	35x
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	32x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	222x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	4x

RAM
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	12x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 1x2GBAsintBench 19%, 231 samples	9x
AD73I1B1672EG 2x2GBAdataBench 25%, 997 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16