Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 65 2-Core 222 62% 118 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 214 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	8.31% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 33 Parallax 40.1 0% 24.4 fps	MRender 27.9 Gravity 28.8 Splatting 31.7 24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 8.31% Great: 25%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD10EZRZ-00HTKB0 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 65 65 79 85 86 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 60 Write 64.2 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 69.9 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 69%
WD WD5000AAKX-08U6AA0 1TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 815GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 152 153 154 153 154 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive	Read 152 Write 149 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 153 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	61.3% Good	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 22.1 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
HKED4081CAA2E1GA2 1x8GBUnknownBench 42%, 31 samples	4x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	3x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	2x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $245

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16