Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 18:12
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 160
2-Core 319
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1,044
101% 832 Pts
64-Core 1,251
77% 1,251 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 105%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1583 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 91.7
Parallax 88.7
74% 90.3 fps
MRender 90.1
Gravity 82.2
Splatting 73.3
66% 81.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 456 470 469 459 461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 474
Mixed 333
SusWrite 460
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 47.6
172% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 173
175% 283 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
80GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 318 321 321 322 321 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 477
Mixed 453
SusWrite 340
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 61.5
218% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 345
250% 326 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
200GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 113 111 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68% Good
Read 126
Write 114
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 111
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 170 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 139
Mixed 78
SusWrite 172
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
663GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 92 87 98 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 53.3
Write 88.7
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 90.3
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
194% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
4GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 26 27 27 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 92
Write 27.7
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 26.5
55% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.2
223% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 27.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 27.7
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X CODE Builds (Compare 1,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $834
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback