HP COMPAQ 8200 Elite

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP COMPAQ 8200 Elite  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 10:14
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 344
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2476
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 450 459 438 272 313 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 471
Mixed 351
SusWrite 394
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 44
141% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 288
217% 289 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
875GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 160 160 159 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 150
Write 171
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 160
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673GB0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 M378B5673GB0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical COMPAQ 8200 Elite Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP COMPAQ 8200 Elite

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback