Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 04 '16 at 00:42
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 47
2-Core 94.4
50% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 187
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 6.62
Parallax 7.59
5% 6.93 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 7.13
Splatting 9.3
7% 8.02 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 107
Mixed 18.9
54% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.2
98% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
8GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 63.5
Mixed 24.4
37% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.35
99% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
646GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 98.8
Write 96.2
Mixed 21.5
85% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.21
67% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 44%
WD 5000AAK External 500GB
17GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 30.1
Mixed 29.7
39% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 22%
Generic SDXC/MMC 1GB
1GB free, PID 1345
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 7.64
Mixed 9.5
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.68
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
16% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 12.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback