Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '19 at 20:38
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 980-$148
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 97.2
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 171
72% 118 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 562
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 76.4
48% 67 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 53.3
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 157 162 163 161 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.3% Good
Read 230
Write 207
Mixed 196
SusWrite 159
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 33.1
118% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 132
112% 162 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 83%
Toshiba MK5059GSX 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: GK003U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 74 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 76
Write 74.8
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 75
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5x4GB
5 of 6 slots used
20GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 12.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 49.6
81% 49.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback