Asrock P67 Extreme6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock P67 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110316
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '19 at 16:03
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 30,335,376 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 350
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 71.4
61% 73.7 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 70
Splatting 71.2
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,053
Write 38.7
Mixed 80.3
220% 1,057 MB/s
4K Read 486
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 5.1
744% 164 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
104GB free
Firmware: 501ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 269
Write 136
Mixed 188
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 30.5
105% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 37.7
39% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
599GB free
Firmware: CC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.9
Write 71.6
Mixed 66.3
59% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
4.5TB free
Firmware: CC49
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99
Write 101
Mixed 19.4
53% 73 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.6
255% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
161GB free
Firmware: CC37
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 97.1
Mixed 58.5
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
208GB free
Firmware: MN6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 117 116 117 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 126
Write 118
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 116
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 156 154 159 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 154
Write 143
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 155
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme6 - $202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback