Lenovo 2553B55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2553B55  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 22:46
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1280 V2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 515
56% 447 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.4% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 68
44% 61.9 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 52.1
45% 56 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 59 72 87 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 118
Write 111
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 77.9
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 88%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 142 145 147 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 149
Write 136
Mixed 68
SusWrite 145
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2553B55 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 2553B55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback