Fujitsu LIFEBOOK AH564

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK AH564  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB36
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 23:39
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
On Board, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 168
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 454
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M
Fujitsu(10CF 17F5) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9126
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.53
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 4.91
4% 5.79 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 6.52
5% 5.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 217 88 55 58 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.9% Good
Read 221
Write 225
Mixed 215
SusWrite 116
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 29.3
125% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 139
116% 169 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 91%
External USB3.0 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 56 55 56 82 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 383
Write 350
Mixed 281
SusWrite 95.1
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 17.7
72% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 106
90% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston HP691160-H65-MCN 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 18.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK AH564 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK AH564

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback