Panasonic CF-SX2JDC5FW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.02GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPanasonic CF-SX2JDC5FW  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFSX2-1
Memory2.2 GB free of 4.01563 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120724
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 02 '16 at 14:09
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 129
60% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 190
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.54
Parallax 3
4% 4.28 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.3
4% 4.79 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$117
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 263
Write 250
Mixed 260
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 11.2
59% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 30.1
DQ Mixed 10.9
12% 19 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 114%
SAMSUNG HD103UI 1TB
292GB free, PID 00a2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 37
Mixed 36.4
47% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.46
89% 1.04 MB/s
TOSHIBA MK3265GSX 320GB
43GB free, PID 201c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 32.6
Mixed 25.1
36% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.24
53% 0.64 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EBU0-DJ-F 52GB
1333, 0 MHz
4096, 49152 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-SX2JDC5FW Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-SX2JDC5FW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback