Asus K52F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K52F  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52F
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 17:34
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 116
52% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 168
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1BE2) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST9320325AS 256GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R042
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 220 219 221 217 222 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 234
Write 220
Mixed 218
SusWrite 219
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 23.2
74% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 166
130% 179 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.2
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52F Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $195
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback