Toshiba SATELLITE C855D-122

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C855D-122  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Pumori
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 14:52
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 45
2-Core 74.4
45% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 124
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Toshiba(1179 FB3B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 3
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 7.13
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 18 41 44 51 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 49
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 37.7
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.2% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C855D-122 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C855D-122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback