Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 11:48
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-8120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
42% Average
SC Int 70.9
SC Float 64.4
SC Mixed 65.9
54% 67.1 Pts
QC Int 206
QC Float 181
QC Mixed 191
44% 193 Pts
MC Int 314
MC Float 302
MC Mixed 339
48% 318 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42%
Great: 53%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 45 61 57 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 74.3
Write 68.7
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 59
40% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 98%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 1,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $636
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $248Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback