Dell OptiPlex 7050

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 7050
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7050  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170619
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 08:06
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BLZ-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 708
76% 606 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 27
Parallax 33.1
21% 28.5 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 26.9
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
781GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 145 147 136 119 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 149
Write 169
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 135
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 107%
WDC WD20 PURX-64P6ZY0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 119 126 122 129 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 146
Write 152
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 124
169% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
WDC WD10 PURX-64E5EY0 1TB
752GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 119 126 122 129 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 124
Write 109
Mixed 43
SusWrite 124
131% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.4% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7050 Builds (Compare 4,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7050

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback