Gigabyte H310M A

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H310M A
Motherboard	Gigabyte H310M A (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '19 at 06:06
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399 38,086 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 89.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 264 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 790 78% 640 Pts	64-Core 1,070 66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6391) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 176 Parallax 173 127% 168 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 169 Splatting 121 111% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A 250GB 4,642 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 213 207 209 206 208 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 460 Write 429 Mixed 338 SusWrite 222 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 33.7 111% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 279 228% 324 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 105%
WL2000GSA6454 2TB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: HPG3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 134 133 133 125 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 129 Write 120 Mixed 95.7 SusWrite 130 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.7 167% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C17 1x16GB 1,265 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.8% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 10.9 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 12.8 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A-CF Builds (Compare 707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte H310M A - $80

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	207x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	154x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	75x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	50x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	53x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	25x
9905702-137.A00G 859B CT8G4DFD824A.C16FF 16GBKingstonBench 77%, 38 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $339

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16