Toshiba Satellite L845D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite L845D  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Pumori
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 01:39
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 72.2
40% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 122
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Toshiba(1179 FB55) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 7
Parallax 4
4% 5.22 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 179 105 90 83 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 395
Write 334
Mixed 288
SusWrite 134
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 19.2
41% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 119
117% 186 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
309GB free
Firmware: AX003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 83.1
Write 82.3
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 88
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64V6H TS1GSK64W6H 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L845D Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L845D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback