Asus P5K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5K  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '16 at 19:56
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 55.6
35% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Zotac(19DA 1203) 1.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6191
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 43
Parallax 35.2
23% 35.6 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 22
Splatting 32.2
23% 27.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.05A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.5% Below average
Read 191
Write 94.3
Mixed 132
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 10.8
58% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 21.1
DQ Mixed 11.2
12% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 86%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58
9GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 28.7
58% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.4
120% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 104%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58
8GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 139
Mixed 32.4
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.45
118% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $399

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback