Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ENVY dv6 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 181B
Memory	4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '19 at 22:10
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 51.6 2-Core 130 54% 88.2 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 312 31% 254 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 181B) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.84% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 5.54 Parallax 2.69 4% 4.16 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 7.91 4% 5.24 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.84% Great: 4%
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% HP(103C 181B) 3GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.1% Above average	Lighting 62 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 86.2 50% 70.8 fps	MRender 75.4 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 49.3 52% 66.1 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 272 277 268 277 271 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 455 Write 376 Mixed 353 SusWrite 282 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 25.4 84% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 68.8 54% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 124%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2013)-$60 4,631 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 255GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 83 74 82 80 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 101 Write 100 Mixed 69 SusWrite 79.4 64% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 9905428-193.A00LF 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 17 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 14.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	280x
GeForce GT 635MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,113 samples	27x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	22x

RAM
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	26x
M471B1G73BH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 1,849 samples	18x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19H 2x4GBAdataBench 46%, 2,021 samples	18x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $458

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16