Asrock Z87M Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z87M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160412
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '19 at 18:31
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$129
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 209
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 579
57% 468 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0468) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.9% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 55.5
Parallax 76
50% 64.4 fps
MRender 52
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 71.3
50% 58.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 80 86 94 98 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 96.1
Write 96.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 87
60% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.T8F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.T8F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87M Extreme4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $411
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback