Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory123.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150926
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '16 at 20:44
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 772
70% 588 Pts
64-Core 2,297
142% 2,297 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6191
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.2% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 59.2
32% 46.5 fps
MRender 52.9
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 28.2
30% 38.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 2,279
Write 1,473
Mixed 1,424
381% 1,725 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 29.2
116% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 78.6
DQ Mixed 22.3
26% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 219%
Great: 283%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270
11TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270
11TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 96.1
Write 89.8
Mixed 83.9
114% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.21
62% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 49%
Corsair Slider 3.0 256GB
238GB free, PID 1a06
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.9% Above average
Read 209
Write 131
Mixed 26.9
130% 122 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.15
22% 1.22 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 65.4
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 44.5
145% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 125%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback