HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181206
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '19 at 06:11
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	96%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Memory 93.3 1-Core 139 2-Core 276 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 545 8-Core 811 84% 678 Pts	64-Core 1,131 70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Lighting 76 Reflection 75 Parallax 65.8 62% 72.3 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 71.2 Splatting 70.4 58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 503 325 325 326 307 315 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 1,865 Write 1,182 Mixed 784 SusWrite 350 231% 1,045 MB/s	4K Read 60.2 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 76.6 266% 93.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,273 DQ Write 1,120 DQ Mixed 1,004 806% 1,133 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 236%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 143 146 144 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 137 Write 150 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 144 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 108%
USB 2.0 PenDrive 4GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4GB free, PID 4567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	4.77% Terrible	Read 17.3 Write 4 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 4.2 8% 7.55 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.77% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB 9,970 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 22.7 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 24.1 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 3,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1,272x
Core i7-8700KIntel $188Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	727x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	597x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	759x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	362x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	294x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $50Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	363x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	175x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	158x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	404x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	223x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $514

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359