Intel DP67BA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemINTEL_ DP67BA__
MotherboardIntel DP67BA  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120622
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '19 at 21:08
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 159
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 311
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 0.72
1% 1.78 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.39 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 132 215 44 50 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 493
Write 422
Mixed 388
SusWrite 150
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 35.5
117% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 150
127% 180 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
212GB free
Firmware: 0002YXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 118 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 73.8
Write 66.8
Mixed 49
SusWrite 118
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DP67BA Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DP67BA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback