Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario KC763AA-ABE SR5250ES (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek Leonite2
Memory	1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070727
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '19 at 11:38
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130 8,675 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	25% Poor	Memory 43.3 1-Core 23.3 2-Core 38.7 24% 35.1 Pts	4-Core 41.8 8-Core 35.9 5% 38.8 Pts	64-Core 46.7 3% 46.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 525ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 74 72 58 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 198 Write 71 Mixed 109 SusWrite 66.9 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 18.6 70% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 74.2 DQ Mixed 89.8 68% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 69%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 710GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 22 24 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 27 Write 15 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 23.3 30% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 142% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 512, 1024, 512 MB Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.71% Terrible	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.71% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16