Asrock Z97 Anniversary

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '19 at 19:54
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 90.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 50.2
8-Core 498
26% 274 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 33.8
36% 38.6 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 36.7
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 180GB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 203 181 179 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 347
Write 212
Mixed 274
SusWrite 182
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 42.8
157% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 143
136% 214 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate Constellation CS 3TB
579GB free
Firmware: CN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 163 163 163 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 168
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 162
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99%
Great: 112%
WD Se 3TB (2013)-$145
105GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 131 132 132 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 168
Write 151
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 131
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 99%
WD Se 3TB (2013)-$145
292GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 104 104 105 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 104
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 99%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$38
121GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 85.7
Write 72
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 80.1
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 76%
WD Se 3TB (2013)-$145
40GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 93 98 99 106 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 124
Write 102
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 100
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-123.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 1,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Anniversary - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $768
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback