Asus P8Z68 DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 29 '16 at 17:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 473
63% 471 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2311.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.6% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 69
46% 54 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 54
Splatting 46.1
37% 44.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
158GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 83.3
Write 72.7
Mixed 75
58% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.14
53% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 67%
WD DW CDW0330ZFXE0 3TB
34GB free
Firmware: 100.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
Read 240
Write 141
Mixed 147
131% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 3.05
4K Mixed 0.24
120% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68 DELUXE Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68 DELUXE - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback